Find resources on how to incorporate measures for the Domains of Impact within adaptation planning processes.
This study advances a novel planning and analytical tool for assessing the potential success or failure of current and future retreat programs.
Date: 02/10/23
Opinion piece on the inclusion of mental health in IPCC assessments.
Date: 02/10/23
This cross-sectional ecological study uses a geographical information system to examine the relationships between the presence and accessibility of green space and county-level mortality in the state of Florida
Date: 02/10/23
Filter by Domain of Impact:
As one interviewee in Ireland explained, MCA enables better integration of “quantified but non-monetised impacts and benefits of flood relief across economic, social and environmental criteria”. However, this still appeared constrained in terms of the impact wider criteria were ultimately having on decision-making and did not appear to open-up spaces for consideration of approaches to adaptation that might be positive for wellbeing if it were more strongly foregrounded. For example, one interviewee in the UK discussed how the allocation of funding prioritises the focus of data collection on defensive/infrastructural approaches to adaptation, limiting the ability to monitor anything that falls outside of direct flood defences.
Measures of legitimacy, trust, identity, anxiety, well-being, efficacy, sense of safety, sense of voice, and a willingness to engage
In the Ghanaian context around 80% of people reported being impacted in eight of the areas measured, reflecting the pervasive consequences of this type of flood adaptation on multiple aspects of people’s lives and across domains of wellbeing. A notable anomaly was the impact on the ability of households to get comprehensive household insurance, which reflects only that household insurance is not widespread in Ghana, highlighting the importance of context for deciding key indicators of impact.
Wellbeing-oriented budgets for Canada and New Zealand in 2021, for example, both highlight health and social solidarity as explicit goals and advocate for systematic surveillance of appropriate metrics. The Well-Being Economy Alliance of countries use advances in well-being metrics to advocate for a Well-Being Economy Policy Design that should be used to evaluate every major policy area.
Where populations and infrastructure are moved from present locations to new lower-risk locations, either individually or as communities, with the objective of long-term sustainability.
The construction and siting of flood walls, levees, defences and drainage systems to prevent floodwater inundation in identified flood zones.
Adaptations from the household to catchment scale that increase resilience to flood risk and improve the ability to recover. It involves building capacity in advance and remedial actions to minimise impact, including flood proofing homes, nature-based approaches, forecasting and warning, insurance, development control and health and social services.
Find definitions for terms that are frequently used in the Healthy Adaptations Hub.
| Terminology | Definition |
|---|---|
| Affect | People’s emotional evaluation of experiences of everyday life. Affective responses to flood interventions are important for understanding the social consequences of adaptations and how these are distributed. Affective responses are also important for galvanising support for adaptation policies because of the way people can influence how they interpret social situations and their intended and actual behaviours. |
| Affective wellbeing | People’s emotional evaluation of everyday life experiences in terms of their preferences versus reality. |
| Place making | [Definition to come] |
The Healthy Adaptations project was undertaken by a team of social scientists, health economists, demographers and hydrologists at the University of Exeter, Maynooth University and the University of Ghana. You can get in touch with the Healthy Adaptations Team at healthyadaptions.org@
The project aimed to develop an evaluation tool for sustainable adaptation that comprehensively incorporates the health and wellbeing consequences of specific adaptation interventions, focusing on flood risk adaptation. Flooding is treated as one of the major climate driven risks given that it causes high levels of mortality globally every year, and has multiple and interacting health dimensions and outcomes. Across the climate change adaptation literature, there is often a focus on singular aspects of how interventions shape wellbeing (e.g. nature connection, mental health, etc.). Far less is understood about the ways in which multiple dimensions of people’s lives are affected by adaptation processes with knock-on consequences for wellbeing outcomes. There is thus a need for deeper understanding of the extent to which different areas of life, referred to in the Healthy Adaptations Hub as ‘Domains of Impact’, are impacted by climate adaptations.
Over the course of the project, the research team framed their analysis around three principal forms of flood adaptation: planned relocation, hard engineering, and living with risk. The team tested and validated new evaluative criteria in the context of real world interventions currently being implemented in Ireland, Ghana, and the UK, working with resident communities, public health and flood risk management practitioners across the three case study locations.
The Healthy Adaptations project established three Expert Panels corresponding to the case study locations:
Ghana
Ireland
UK